Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SO2D 293 - Rolling v. State

Rolling v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State · 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State · 748 So. 2d 1028 - Stephens v. State · Zaidi v. Northern Virginia Hospital Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[c]ounsel cannot be deemed ineffective merely because current counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategic decisions. Moreover, strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel's decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “surrounding this trial and that the prospective jurors had not been unduly affected by any pretrial publicity are supported by competent, substantial evidence and, accordingly, will not be disturbed by this Court. Applying the law to the trial court's factual findings, we conclude that Gore has not demonstrated how Hunt's strategic decision not to seek a change of venue was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.