Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SO2D 362 - Trotter v. State

Trotter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Heggs v. State · 515 So. 2d 161 - Carawan v. State · Cheshire v. State · 439 So. 2d 219 - State v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Double Jeopardy Clause is not an absolute bar to the imposition of an increased sentence on remand from an authorized appellate review of an issue of law concerning the original sentence. [The defendant] has not been deprived of any reasonable expectation of finality in his original sentence, nor has he been subject to repeated attempts to convict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]nce the court has determined that the sentence was indeed illegal and the prisoner is entitled to a modification of the original sentence or the imposition of a new sentence, the full panoply of due process considerations attach.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[d]ue process of law . . . requires that vindictiveness against a defendant for having successfully attacked his first conviction must play no part in the sentence he receives after a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.