Munnerlyn v. Wingster’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 383 So. 2d 1134 - Hegler v. Hegler · 687 So. 2d 1300 - Brown v. State · Brown v. Tan · Chastain v. Scandinavian Health Spas · 592 So. 2d 1179 - FLORIDA AUTO. DEALERS INDUSTRY v. Small
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court's determination of subject matter jurisdiction is subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re DNHW · Sanchez v. Fernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.