Graham v. State

Sandra GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 30, 2002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-08-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2003

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“without prejudice to any right Graham may have to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 if she wishes to challenge the factual accuracy of the trial court's records concerning the dates she was in jail.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Graham v. State

Relies on Hamilton v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-08-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1PER CURIAM.

¶2Affirmed without prejudice to any right Graham may have to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 if she wishes to challenge the factual accuracy of the trial court's records concerning the dates she was in jail. See Hamilton v. State,752 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

¶3BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.