Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SO2D 678 - Cook v. State

Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · 473 So. 2d 952 - Gavin v. State · 440 So. 2d 318 - Mason v. State · 656 So. 2d 1192 - Holland v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Though not normally permitted, there are circumstances in which the State may restrain a defendant. When reasonable grounds exist to apprehend a danger of escape, a trial judge has discretion to require shackles or other restraints. Rush v. State, 301 So.2d 297, 300 (Miss.1974). Here, the defendant had once escaped and successfully avoided capture for four months.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.