Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SO2D 994 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2020

12 state decisions

100200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 770 So. 2d 743 - Mortimer v. State · McCray v. State · 619 So. 2d 31 - Uvanni v. Gallenga

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850 to seek withdrawal of his plea based upon its involuntary character due to the incorrect scoresheet. Although in his filings with this court he has stated that he does not wish to withdraw his plea, that is his only avenue of relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “when a defendant enters a negotiated plea for a term of years relying upon an incorrectly calculated scoresheet, such sentence is not illegal if it does not exceed the statutory maximum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.