Haggerty v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 182nd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Rose v. State · Ingham v. State · Ex Parte Cruz · Mercado v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Two or more defendants who are jointly or separately indicted or complained against for the same offense or any offense growing out of the same transaction may be, in the discretion of the court, tried jointly or separately as to one or more defendants; provided that ... in cases in which, upon timely motion to sever, and evidence introduced thereon, it is made known to the court that there is a previous admissible conviction against one defendant or that a joint trial would be prejudicial to any defendant, the court shall order a severance as to the defendant whose joint trial would prejudice the other defendant or defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.