¶1ORDER
¶2Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo.Supp.1991. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent sexual offender to 30 years imprisonment. We affirm. The trial court did not err, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).