Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

825 S.W.2d 709

Dawkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1992

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1992-03-18

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2008

10 state decisions

Relies on Sheffield v. State · Dawkins v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1OPINION

PER CURIAM.

¶2A jury convicted appellant of the felony offense of driving while intoxicated and assessed punishment at confinement for twenty years and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Dawkins v. State, 822 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.App.—Waco, 1991).

¶3Appellant raises four grounds for review. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

/825/sw2d/709 · .json · Public domain