Kelley v. Prock’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2012
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re the Marriage of Lafferty · Allen v. Smith · In Re the Marriage of Chilton · Mothershead v. Milfeld · Brummell v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘Acquiescence for a length of time is evidence of a parol agreement that the line so delineated is to be considered the boundary line[,][a]nd, where the line has been acquiesced in for a great number of years by all the parties interested, it is conclusive evidence of an agreement to that line.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he trial judge is in a better position than this court to determine the credibility of the parties, their sincerity, character and other trial intangibles which may not be shown by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re SM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.