Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 F.2d 1177 - In Re Chateaugay Corporation, Reomar, Inc., the Ltv Corporation, Debtors

In Re Chateaugay Corporation, Reomar, Inc., the Ltv Corporation, Debtors’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2024

1 district ·

10019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Catlin v. United States · Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. C H Langdeau Republic National Bank of Dallas · Packerland Packing Co. v. Griffith Brokerage Co. · Century Laminating, Ltd. v. Montgomery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The district court shall, on timely motion of a party, so withdraw a proceeding if the court determines that resolution of the proceeding requires consideration of both title 11 and other laws of the United States regulating organizations or activities affecting interstate commerce.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “). Mandatory withdrawal is not at issue here. - 22 - of a reference to the bankruptcy court do not conclusively determine any substantive issue; they merely address where that issue will initially be decided.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although the distinction between the mandatory and discretionary portions of Section 157(d) surely dictates the scope of appellate review of the respective decisions, it is in no way pertinent to the question of whether either type of order is final or interlocutory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.