Marine Bank, National Ass'n v. Meat Counter, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.2d 1577 · 1987
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co. (1989), Lorenzen v. Employees Retirement Plan of the Sperry & Hutchinson Co. (1990)
12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States · DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · Charles v. Daley · Bartman v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule in this circuit is 'that all substantive motions served within 10 days of the entry of a judgment will be treated as based on Rule 59, and therefore as tolling the time for appeal.' Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343 , 347 (7th Cir.1986) (citing Harcon ...).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“This argument misunderstands the narrow, modern definition of ‘justifiable reliance’ .... A recipient’s fault in not knowing or discovering the facts before making the contract does not make his reliance unjustified unless it amounts to a failure to act in good faith and in accordance with reasonable standards of fair dealing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Wisconsin applies the position taken in the Restatement (Second) of Contracts in determining whether a misrepresentation theory of defense voids a contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.