United States v. Lemaire’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.2d 387 · 1987
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Morales (1988), Kendall v. Sorani (In Re Richmond Produce Co.) (1996)
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1 · 12 U.S.C. § 36 · 12 U.S.C. § 38 · 12 U.S.C. § 91 · 15 U.S.C. § 16 (§ 5 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2006 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283
Relies on Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn. · Mitchum v. Foster · Anschuetz & Co. v. Mississippi River Bridge Authority · Mitchum v. Foster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““... no attachment, injunction or execution shall be issued against such [national banking] association or its property before final judgment in any suit or action or proceedings, in any state, county or municipal court.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he term ‘final judgment’ as used in 12 U.S.C. § 91 means a judgment on the merits which is no longer subject to examination on appeal, either because of disposition on appeal and conclusion of the appellate process, or because of the passage, without action, of the time for seeking appellate review.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prevent creditors from obtaining preferential treatment by court action, including the securing of a judgment at the trial court level.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.