United States v. Crooks’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.2d 4 · 1987
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably United States v. Iles (1990), United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1989)
34 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1361 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Rogers v. United States · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc. · Patterson v. United States · Tinkle v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for an appeal 'the date the action occasioning retrial became final is the day the mandate is issued.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the date the action occasioning the retrial becomes final.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.