Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 F.2d 647 - Green v. Carlson

Green v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis

826 F.2d 647 · 1987

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
3
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

61 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Rakovich v. Wade (1988), Poe v. Haydon (1988)

61 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

6001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Malley v. Briggs · Carlson v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the law was clear in relation to the specific facts confronting the public official when he or she acted.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... our cases establish that the right the official is alleged to have violated must have been “clearly established” in a more particularized, and hence more relevant, sense: The contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right. This is not to say that an official action is protected by qualified immunity unless the very action in question has been held unlawful ... but it is to say that in the light of preexisting law the unlawfulness must be apparent.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Governmental officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.