Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 F.2d 671 - Tavarez v. O'Malley

Tavarez v. O'Malley’s Empirical Analysis

826 F.2d 671 · 1987

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

34 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Easter House v. Felder (1990), Wilson v. Civil Town of Clayton (1988)

34 federal appellate ·

2801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Parratt v. Taylor · Hudson v. Palmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the person committing the unconstitutional act may be employed at such a low level of state or local government that the official authorized to grant a pre-deprivation hearing would be unaware of the person's actions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “place[ ] beyond the reach of section 1983 any loss that 'is not a result of some established state procedure' ... [because] the state cannot predict when a loss will occur.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the officials authorized to grant such a hearing are unaware of the deprivation before it occurs,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.