Cropper v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.3d 1280 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6212 · 26 U.S.C. § 6213 · 26 U.S.C. § 6330 · 26 U.S.C. § 6331
Relies on Craig v. Comm'r · Hoyle v. Comm'r · Jones v. Commissioner · Jones v. Commissioner · Guthrie v. Sawyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen the Tax Court decision rests on its review of an Office of Appeals’ determination following a CDP hearing, we apply the same standards as the Tax Court. Thus, we review the Office of Appeals’ determinations about challenges to the amount of the underlying tax liability de novo and its administrative determinations unrelated to the amount of tax liability for abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence corroborating an actual timely mailing of the notice of deficiency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Noyes v. Comm'r“presumptive proof of a valid assessment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.