Hosseini v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.3d 354 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1159 (§ 209 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Califano v. Sanders · Bennett v. Spear · Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. · Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory) ... and regardless of whether the judgment, decision or action is made in removal proceedings, no court shall have jurisdiction to review-(i) any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section 1182(h), 1182(i), 1229b, 1229c, or 1255 of this title, or (ii) any [ ] decision or action of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority for which is specified under this subchapter 3 to be in the discretion of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hosseini v. Nielsen“may review 'non-discretionary decisions that underlie determinations that are ultimately discretionary.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hosseini v. Nielsen“did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hosseini v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.