Lima v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.3d 606 · 2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Padilla v. Kentucky · Henry v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Thomas v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Elysee v. Gonzales · Ouk v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the IJ should not have found ... police reports credible and should instead have credited his own testimony”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perez v. Barr“colorable legal or constitutional claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perez v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.