Martinez v. Cahue’s Empirical Analysis
826 F.3d 983 · 2016
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2020
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Illinois Northern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 9001
Relies on Ornelas v. United States · Abbott v. Abbott · 212 Ill. 2d 441 - People v. Arthur H. · Mozes v. Mozes · Richard Charles Whallon Jr v. Diana Lynn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“she had sole custody over [the child] under Illinois law, and neither Illinois law nor the Convention precluded her from moving with her son to Mexico with or without [the father's] permission”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.