Ham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dill v. State · Ludy v. State · Fehlman v. State · Carter v. State · Schmidt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“emphasize one particular evidentiary fact, witness, or phase of the case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gravens v. State · Reese v. State“A defendant's refusal to submit to a chemical test may be considered as evidence of intoxication.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gravens v. State · Reese v. State“Whether a defendant's refusal to submit to a chemical test is evidence of intoxication or merely that the defendant refused to take the test is for the lawyers to argue and the jury to decide. An instruction from the bench one way or the other misleads the jury by unnecessarily emphasizing one evidentiary fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gravens v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.