Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 P.2d 132 - Malone v. Parker

Malone v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Madsen v. Borthick · Colman v. Utah State Land Board · Millett v. Clark Clinic Corp. · Wilde v. Mid-Century Insurance Co. · Noble v. Noble

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The party invoking this doctrine must demonstrate the following: (1) the issue involved in the subsequent action is identical to the issue decided in the previous action; (2) the issue was decided in a final judgment on the merits; (3) the issue was competently, fully, and fairly litigated in the first action; and (4) the party against whom the doctrine is invoked must be either a party to the first action or in privity with that party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.