Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 P.2d 365 - People v. Arnold

People v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co. · United States v. Lemonakis · Kogan v. People · People v. Dement · People v. Huckleberry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(tlhe utterances of others contained 'on the tape . are not hearsay because they were offered for the sole and limited purpose of putting the responses of the defendant in context and making them understandable to the jury, and not for the truth of their content.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “adequately instructed the jury as to the limited purposes for which the non-party utterances on the tape might be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reliability or truth is not at issue. 'The only pertinent fact is that they were made”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.