Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 SO2D 272 - DuFresne v. State

DuFresne v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 387 So. 2d 943 - State v. Hagan · State v. Wershow · 629 So. 2d 841 - Brown v. State · 394 So. 2d 981 - Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Metro. Dade County · 698 So. 2d 533 - State v. Mark Marks, PA

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) "Child abuse" means: (a) Intentional infliction of physical or mental injury upon a child; (b) An intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical and mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, permanent disability, or permanent disfigurement to the child commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. (emphasis added).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an injury to the intellectual or psychological capacity of a child as evidenced by a discernable and substantial impairment in the ability to function within the normal range of performance and behavior.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is defined in section 39.01(30) and includes infliction of injury on a child physically, emotionally, or mentally. The court reasoned that: [t]he fact that these statutes have essentially the same underlying purpose, i.e., the protection of children, lends further support to our conclusion that . . . these provisions should be read in proper relation to one another. Furthermore, we note, the definition of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.