Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 SO2D 354 - Feldpausch v. State

Feldpausch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 733 So. 2d 963 - Cottle v. State · Lewis v. State · 620 So. 2d 1012 - Angell v. Don Jones Ins. Agency Inc. · 766 So. 2d 1095 - Eristma v. State · 761 So. 2d 1221 - Kp Meiring Const., Inc. v. Northbay I & E, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a `good faith resumption of plea negotiations.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 964 So. 2d 213 - Beasley v. State · 851 So. 2d 839 - Rudolf v. State
  2. “no conflicting testimony that required the [postconviction] court to assess the relative credibility of different witnesses,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. TAKENDRICK CAMPBELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  3. “[t]his court has no authority to require the State to reoffer its original plea offer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 851 So. 2d 839 - Rudolf v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.