¶1Affirmed. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that “[a] pretrial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.”)
826 So. 2d 365
D.T.N. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 31, 2002
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-05-31
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2004
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“[a] pretrial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific, contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Dessin v. State
Relies on Pendarvis v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2002-05-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →