Norman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2009
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith · 684 So. 2d 736 - Chicone v. State · 808 So. 2d 166 - Scott v. State · 514 So. 2d 1079 - Booker v. State · 532 So. 2d 9 - Heath v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Repeal or amendment of a criminal statute shall not affect prosecution or punishment for any crime previously committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The effect of this constitutional provision is to give to all criminal legislation a prospective effectiveness; that is to say, the repeal or amendment, by subsequent legislation, of a pre-existing criminal statute does not become effective, either as a repeal or as an amendment of such pre-existing statute, in so far as offenses are concerned that have been already committed prior to the taking effect of such repealing or amending law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“repugnant to article X, section 9, of the Florida Constitution, which prohibits retroactive application of statutes in criminal proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.