Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 SO2D 465 - R.R. v. State

R.R. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 547 So. 2d 321 - Robinson v. State · 497 So. 2d 912 - R.V. v. State · 548 So. 2d 895 - CH v. State · Sims v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is any instrument which will likely cause death or great bodily harm when used in the ordinary and usual manner contemplated by its design and construction. An object can be a deadly weapon if its sole modern use is to cause great bodily harm. An object not designed for use as a weapon may nonetheless be a deadly weapon if its use, intended use, or threatened use by the defendant was in a manner likely to inflict death or great bodily harm. § 790.001(14), Fla. Stat.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.