Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 SO2D 55 - Singleton v. Northfield Ins. Co.

Singleton v. Northfield Ins. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 617 So. 2d 880 - Stobart v. State Through DOTD · Gomez v. Dade County School Board · Stearns v. City of Gig Harbor · McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of La., Inc. · 703 So. 2d 542 - Ford v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The interest of the members of the class in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions; (b) The extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by or against members of the class; (c) The desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation in the particular forum; (d) The difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of a class action; (e) The practical ability of individual class members to pursue their claims without class certification; (f) The extent to which the relief plausibly demanded on behalf of or against the class, including the vindication of such public policies or legal rights as may be implicated, justifies the costs and burdens of class litigation[.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he class is or may be defined objectively in terms of ascertainable criteria. . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Article 591A(2) requires that there be questions of law or fact common to the class. Paragraph B(3) of that article requires that these common questions predominate over any questions affecting only individual members. This requirement restricts class actions to those cases in which it would achieve economies of time, effort, and expense, and promote uniformity of decision as to persons similarly situated, without sacrificing procedural fairness or bringing about other undesirable results. McCastle, 456 So.2d at 616 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.