826 So. 2d 577 - Weeks, Kavanagh & Rendeiro v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Banks v. State Farm Ins. Co. · 402 So. 2d 282 - Carpenter v. Travelers Ins. Co. · 346 So. 2d 1131 - Butler v. Flint-Goodridge Hosp. of Dillard U. · 678 So. 2d 959 - State v. Baynes · Leger v. Delahoussaye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n appeal may be taken from a final judgment under Article 1915(A) without the judgment being ... designated [a final judgment under Article 1915(B)].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We are not restricted by the cases cited by defendant to support its argument that this judgment is not appealable, because those cases were rendered prior to a 1999 amendment to Article 1915(B)(1). [FN 3 omitted.] Prior to the 1999 amendment, a judgment that related to “as to one or more but less than all of the claims, demands, issues, theories, or parties [emphasis added]” could not constitute a final judgment unless designated as such by the court “after an express determination that there is no just reason for delay.” Acts 1999, No. 1263, § 1, eliminated the term “parties” from (B)(1) to eliminate confusion with Article 1915(A). A partial final judgment under Article 1915(B) is appealable only if so designated by the court, while a final judgment under Article 1915(A) is appealable without being so designated, except for a partial summary judgment under Article 966(E). As mentioned above, Art. 966(E) is not applicable to the summary judgment in favor of Federal; thus, the judgment before us is appealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[d]ismisses the suit as to less than all of the parties, defendants, third party plaintiffs, third party defendants, or intervenors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.