Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 826 SO2D 792 - Ex Parte Alapati

Ex Parte Alapati’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395N (§ 1835 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc. · 720 So. 2d 893 - Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. · 397 So. 2d 98 - Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc. · 590 So. 2d 252 - Joy Manufacturing Co. v. Montgomery · Ex Parte Compass Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n light of the trial court's broad discretion concerning matters of discovery, we defer to the trial court's perception of the facts and procedural posture of the parties....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.