Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 F.2d 1210 - Centralab, Inc., Fort Dodge, Iowa v. Local No. 816, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America

Centralab, Inc., Fort Dodge, Iowa v. Local No. 816, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America’s Empirical Analysis

827 F.2d 1210 · 1987

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
March 2014
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2014

8 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here an arbitrator goes beyond his contractual authority to decide issues not properly before him, his award fails to draw its essence from the agreement and must be vacated, despite the usual great deference given to arbitrator's awards.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “a court concludes that the arbitrator did not stay within the bounds of his authority, this principle of deference inevitably gives way ... to the greater principle that an award not drawing its essence from the agreement is not entitled to judicial enforcement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “arbitration is a matter of contract and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed so to submit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.