Kanarek v. Hatch’s Empirical Analysis
827 F.2d 1389 · 1987
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2006 · most notably In Re Jonathan Barnes Leavitt, Debtor. Jonathan Barnes Leavitt v. Carlos Soto (1999), Goehring v. Brophy (1996)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927
Relies on Optyl Eyewear Fashion International Corp. v. Style Companies, Ltd. · Toombs v. Leone · Swanson v. Levy · Liew v. Breen · United States v. Associated Convalescent Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The imposition of sanctions under section 1927 requires a finding that the attorney acted recklessly or in bad faith.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a complete understanding of the issues may be had [from the record] without the aid of separate findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.