Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 F.2d 530 - National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers’s Empirical Analysis

827 F.2d 530 · 1987

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
March 2003
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2003

14 federal appellate ·

80198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 103 (Norris-LaGuardia Act)

Relies on PruneYard Shopping Center v. Robins · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · American Distributing Company Inc v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 433 · Industrial Technical and Professional Employees Division National Maritime Union of America v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] union's duty of fair representation requires it to permit hiring hall applicants to inspect dispatch records unless such inspection is shown to be `burdensome' or the records contain `truly confidential material.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Weighed against this [speculative] evidence was the uncontroverted fact”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The limitation period [of section 10(b) ] does not begin to run until the party filing the charge receives actual notice that an unfair labor practice has occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.