Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 F.2d 622 - LaMere v. Risley

LaMere v. Risley’s Empirical Analysis

827 F.2d 622 · 1987

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
4
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably State v. Thorne (1996), United States v. Oliver (1995)

37 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

4601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Blockburger v. United States · Hamling v. United States · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Oyler v. Boles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining whether disclosure was timely enough to satisfy due process, we consider the prosecution's reasons for late disclosure, and whether the defendant had an opportunity to make use of the disclosed material.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “given ample opportunity to mitigate any surprise or prejudice he may have suffered as a result of the late notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a good understanding of the issues and the ability to present forcefully and coherently his contentions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.