Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 F.2d 728 - In Re James N Constant

In Re James N Constant’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
June 2002
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]very departure from the original patent ... must be particularly and distinctly specified and supported in the original, or a supplemental, reissue oath or declaration under 37 C.F.R. 1.175.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ppellant has failed to show any error of law in the Board's application of rule 175 or in the rule's promulgation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “failed to address the remaining 'excesses and insufficiencies' as required by § 1.175(a)(3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.