In re Sealed Case’s Empirical Analysis
827 F.2d 776 · 1987
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2018
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1826 · 28 U.S.C. § 49 · 28 U.S.C. § 515
Relies on United States v. Calandra · Cobbledick v. United States · United States v. Dionisio · United States v. Ryan · Blair v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he claim that a subpoena was applied for and issued under the signature of unauthorized persons would constitute a cognizable claim of undue burden or unlawfulness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.