United States v. King’s Empirical Analysis
827 F.2d 864 · 1987
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2024
11 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2384 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on Bain Jr · United States v. Miller · California Department of Corrections v. United States · United States v. Jarabek · United States v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not after the defendant has been put in jeopardy”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“considerable latitude in Rule 403 rulings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defendant remains charged with the same crimes and that the inclusion or deletion of Predicate Act 26 [alleging murder] would have no impact upon the elements of those crimes, but merely impact upon the proof the government would be allowed to bring on the RICO, RICO conspiracy, and seditious conspiracy charges. The government suggests that, indeed, if Predicate Act 26 had impacted on the elements of the crimes charged in the indictment, the prior deletion of Predicate Act 26, approved by the district court, would have been an improper amendment of the indictment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.