Draper v. Healey’s Empirical Analysis
827 F.3d 1 · 2016
Citation profile
6 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 209 · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance · Summers v. Earth Island Institute · Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. · United States v. AVX Corp. · 135 S. Ct. 2401 - Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We now turn to the dealers' claim that the load indicator requirement is vague in violation of due process, a constitutional claim eligible only for as-applied, not facial, review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Worma v. Healey“the association must, at the very least, 'identify [a] member[] who ha[s] suffered the requisite harm.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[f]air' notice is understood as notice short of semantic certainty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Worma v. Healey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.