Al-Saffy v. Vilsack’s Empirical Analysis
827 F.3d 85 · 2016
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 3927 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Darden · Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. Wells · Tao v. Freeh L · Bowden v. United States · Spirides v. Reinhardt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“borrows language from NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania , 691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982), asking whether the employer, while contracting in good faith with an otherwise independent company, has retained for itself sufficient control of the terms and conditions of employment of the employees who are employed by the other employer.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“recognized two largely overlapping articulations of the test for identifying joint-employer status.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“employer has the right to control and direct the work of an individual, not only as to the result to be achieved, but also as to the details by which that result is achieved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.