827 F. Supp. 450 - Nabkey v. Hoffius’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
November 1995
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Shillitani v. United States · State v. Simpson · Tristani v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Miss Nabkey’s disdain for judicial authority is evidenced first by the fact that this action has at one time or another involved claims against no less than six judges. During the course of this case’s tortured history, she has accused them, among others, not simply of erroneously making decisions adverse or injurious of her rights, but in language scandalous and vexatious, or orchestrating a “cold-blooded,” “Machiavellian conspiracy,” an “enterprise of terror.” ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ * Further, ... her disdain for judicial authority has contributed mightily and needlessly to the multiplication and protraction of proceedings. Nearly every adverse ruling has been followed by a motion for reconsideration, then by a motion to set aside, and then often by an appeal to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. None of these machinations has ever merited relief; they have served merely to prolong the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.