Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 FSUPP2D 294 - Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.

Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
May 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 255 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Ala Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Among the provisions for the enforcement of the act an old principle has been adopted and will be applied to new uses. If there shall occur violations of either the wages or hours, the employees can themselves, or by designated agent or representatives, maintain an action in any court to recover the wages due them and in such a case the court shall allow liquidated damages in addition to the wages due equal to such deficient payment and shall also allow a reasonable attorney’s fees and assess the court costs against the violator of the law so that employees will not suffer the burden of an expensive lawsuit. The provision has the further virtue of minimizing the cost of enforcement by the Governments. It is both a common-sense and economical method of regulation. The bill has other penalties for violations and other judicial remedies, but the provision which I have mentioned puts directly into the hands of the employees who are affected by violation the means and ability to assert and enforce their own rights, thus avoiding the assumption by Government of the sole responsibility to enforce the act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “makes arbitration the required and exclusive forum for the resolution of all disputes arising out of or in any way related to employment based on legally protection rights ... that may arise between an employee or former employee and Citi ... including, without limitation, claims, demands, or actions under ... the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ... and any other federal, state, or local statute, regulation, or common-law doctrine regarding employment, employment discrimination, the terms and conditions of employment, termination of employment, compensation, breach of contract, defamation, retaliation, whistle-blowing, or any claims arising under the Citigroup Separation Pay Plan.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Citi reserves the right to revise, amend, modify, or discontinue the [Arbitration] Policy at any time in its sole discretion with 30 days’ written notice. Such amendments may be made by publishing them in the Handbook or by separate release to employees and shall be effective 30 calendar days after such amendments are provided to employees and will apply prospectively only. Your continuation of employment after receiving such amendments shall be deemed acceptance of the amended terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.