Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 N.E.2d 1127 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Smylie v. State · Cooper v. State · J.R. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the trial court's decision, [we find] that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Or we could alter the sentences ourselves within the bounds of Blakely using our review and revise power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.