Patrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Smylie v. State · Teeters v. State · Bledsoe v. State · Patrick v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a third option, the State may elect to forgo the em-panelling of a jury and stipulate to [Ba-ber's] being resentenced by the trial court only in light of the aggravating factors for which a jury determination is unnecessary....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baber v. State“reserve[d] for another day an explicit determination”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Neff v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.