Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 827 NE2D 34 - Daugherty v. Dearborn County

Daugherty v. Dearborn County’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Galbreath v. City of Indianapolis · 109 Ind. App. 70 - Volk v. City of Michigan City · Jamerson v. Anderson Newspapers, Inc. · City of Tipton v. Baxter · McConnell v. Porter Memorial Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). We conclude that the Coopers' own statements support the reasonable inference that their claims accrued more than 180 days prior to their filing a Notice of Tort Claim. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the trial court appropriately granted the Town's Motion for Summary Judgment. Affirmed. VAIDIK, J., and BARNES, J., concur. NOTES [1] The trial court entered Summary Judgment for the Town, finding that the Coopers”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ctual knowledge or routine investigation of the flood did not relieve Daugherty of his duty to give notice that he intended to hold the County liable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.