Corcoran v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “After a review of these pleadings, the Supreme Court’s May 12, 2005 Opinion, the Supreme Court Order approving the trial court’s ease management schedule, the trial court finds the Petition for Post-Conviction Relief filed on February 10, 2005 is untimely. (Seventeen (17) months past the September 9, 2003 deadline.) Pursuant to the Supreme Court approved case management schedule, defendant was required to file a proper Petition for Post-Conviction relief on or before September 9, 2003. As defendant did not comply with this required deadline, the Petition filed February 10, 2005 is ordered dismissed as time-barred.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 483 F. Supp. 2d 709 - Corcoran v. Buss

2. “There is nothing new about our holding that a person who seeks post-conviction relief in a capital case must file a signed petition by the date set forth in the case management schedule. This has been the rule in our state for approximately 15 years. Ind.Crim. Rule 24(H) (1990). Counsel's action in this case-filing the unsigned petition on the date set forth in the case management schedule-indicates that they were well aware of the requirement.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Corcoran v. State

3. “); Corcoran v. State, 820 N.E.2d 655 (Ind. 2005) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Corcoran v. State