Crook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Alabama v. White · Litchfield v. State · Beverly v. State · D.H. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the degree of concern, suspicion, or knowledge that a violation has occurred, 2) the degree of intrusion the method of the search or seizure imposes on the citizen's ordinary activities, and 3) the extent of law enforcement needs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harmon · Love v. State“However, 'it is not reasonable for law enforcement to search indiscriminately through people's trash.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harmon · Love v. State“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search or seizure, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harmon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.