Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

827 P.2d 1339

63 O.B.A.J. 769

Cannon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1992-03-03

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2008

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relies on Lafevers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge,

¶1concurring in part/dissenting in part.

¶2I concur in the Court’s decision to affirm the judgment and sentence for the offenses of Burglary in the First Degree, Robbery *1344in the First Degree, Kidnapping and Larceny of a Motor Vehicle. However, I must dissent to the Court’s analysis of mutually antagonistic defenses based on the facts of this case and the Court’s decision to reverse and remand for a new trial the convictions for Murder First Degree, Third Degree Arson, First Degree Rape and Forcible Anal Sodomy, for the reasons expressed in my separate opinion in Lafevers v. State, 819 P.2d 1362 (Okl.Cr.1991).

/827/p2d/1339 · .json · Public domain