Lanari v. People’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably People v. Harlan (2000), Masters v. People (2002)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · Brady v. United States · Harris v. New York · Jenkins v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Marks · People v. Fasy“privilege applies only to statements made in circumstances giving rise to a reasonable expectation that the statements will be treated as confidential.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. D.A.S. v. People · Gordon v. Boyles“a common sense inquiry: whether an untrained lay person would be qualified to determine a particular issue ‘intelligently and to the best possible degree without enlightenment from those having a specialized understanding of the subject involved in the dispute.’”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.