827 P.2d 865
63 O.B.A.J. 532
Decided February 18, 1992
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1992-02-18
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1408
Relies on Smith v. Smith
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-02-18
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial Hospital (1996), Akin v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (1998)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1dissenting in part.
¶2I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Smith v. Smith, 652 P.2d 297, 299 (Okl.1982).
¶3I am of the opinion that modification of support alimony awards are subject to modification on a “needs basis” since remedial legislation by the U.S. Congress
¶5. 12 O.S.1981, § 1289(E).